摘要：陈振声（教育部长）：我国教育体系旨在激发学习热忱、发掘潜能并培养社会公民。为此我们构建了多元化升学通道，附属学校以其历史传承与独特文化成为重要组成部分。

2025年2月5 日，新加坡教育部长陈振声在国会书面答复盛港集选区议员林志蔚副教授有关降低附属小学学生进入中学的分数线问题。

以下内容为新加坡眼根据国会英文资料翻译整理：

18. 林志蔚副教授（盛港集选区议员）询问教育部长：

(a) 附属中学调低对口小学毕业生入学分数线的政策依据是什么？

(b) 教育部是否监管各校具体降分幅度？

(c) 附属中学如何确保优待入学学生学业表现不落后于普通生？

陈振声（教育部长）：我国教育体系旨在激发学习热忱、发掘潜能并培养社会公民。为此我们构建了多元化升学通道，附属学校以其历史传承与独特文化成为重要组成部分。

在实现这一平衡过程中，我们认识到在政策上需考量三大维度：

首先，我们希望根据学生的个人特长和兴趣对他们进行合理分班。现在，包括附属学校在内的整个中学系统都实行全面科目编班制（Full-Subject Based Banding），能比以前更精准地匹配学生专长。

其次，我们认识到附属学校在教育方面的一些优点。例如，附属学校政策为具有悠久历史和独特文化的学校提供了机会，使其能够在较长时期内始终如一地向学生灌输学校的价值观、校风和文化。

第三，我们要确保我们的社会保持开放和凝聚力，而不是封闭和分裂。这要从我们的学校做起。尽管我们支持学校文化、价值观和传统的建设，但这绝不能以牺牲社会凝聚力和我们作为一个国家的主张为代价。

这就是为什么随着我们的社会逐渐成熟，面临着更大的分层风险，我们的教育体系也在不断发展。其中一个例子是，教育部（MOE）要求附属中学从 2019 年中一派位工作开始，为非附属学生保留 20% 的学额，而以前是没有的。在教育部的鼓励下，一些附属学校还收紧了附属学校必须达到的 “附属学校最低要求”，以便非附属学校的学生有更多机会优先入学。

自 2021 年中一派位以来，每年都有约半数来自非对口小学。其余一半则来自所属的附属小学。附属小学与非附属小学的截分差异，视派位组别而定。三类派位组别（Posting Group）分数线差异如下：

🔹 第三组别：附属生与非附属生平均差7分

🔹 第二组别：平均差2分

🔹 第一组别：平均差1分

虽然这可能是我们目前所确定的平衡点，但随着时间的推移和情况的变化，我们将继续调整和进一步完善，以便在今后取得适当的平衡。

以下是英文质询内容：

18 Assoc Prof Jamus Jerome Limasked the Minister for Education (a) what is the rationale for secondary schools with Affiliated primary schools to receive reductions in Secondary 1 entry scores; (b) whether the Ministry exercises oversight over the magnitude of the reductions in entry scores applied by each school; and (c) how effective have these secondary schools been in ensuring that the high-scoring students do not fall behind relative to their peers that entered with lower scores.

Mr Chan Chun Sing: In Singapore, our goals in education are to spark the joy of learning in students, help them realise their potential and build the foundations for them to be active, contributing members of society. This is why we have a variegated education landscape that offers our students a range of school options catering to their diverse interests, needs and strengths. Affiliated schools contribute to one part of this landscape, with their long history and distinctive school culture.

In achieving this balance, we acknowledge that there are competing policy tensions.

First, we want to right-site our students based on their individual strengths and interests. Now, with Full-Subject Based Banding across our secondary school system, including affiliated schools, we are better able to achieve this today than before.

Second, we recognise that there are some educational merits to school affiliation. For example, the affiliation policy provides schools with a long history and distinctive culture with the opportunity to consistently imbue their school values, ethos and culture into their students over a longer period.

Third, we want to ensure that our society remains open and cohesive; not closed and fractured. This starts in our schools. Even as we support the building of school culture, values and tradition, this must not come at the expense of social cohesion and what we stand for as a nation.

This is why we have evolved our education system over time, as our society matures and faces greater risk of becoming more stratified. One example was when the Ministry of Education (MOE) required affiliated secondary schools to reserve 20% of places for non-affiliated students, when there was none before, from the 2019 Secondary 1 Posting Exercise. With MOE’s encouragement, some affiliated schools have also tightened the Affiliate Minimum Requirements that affiliates must meet to be eligible for priority to the school, facilitating greater access for non-affiliated students.

For each year since the 2021 Secondary 1 Posting Exercise, about half of the Secondary 1 cohort of the affiliated secondary schools are from non-affiliated primary schools, with the remaining half from their respective affiliated primary schools. The difference in cut-off points between affiliates and non-affiliates varies depending on the Posting Group. For Posting Group 3, the average difference is about seven points. For Posting Groups 2 and 1, the average difference is smaller, at two and one point respectively, as the ranges of cut-off points in these posting groups are narrower than for Posting Group 3. The median mirrors the average for all three Posting Groups.

While this may be the current balance that we have established for now, we will continue to adjust and make further refinements, as time goes by and circumstances change, so that we can achieve the right balance for the future.

来源：新加坡眼一点号