摘要：这多年，一些高校和科研院所，在课题资金分配、人才称号评选等方面，存在诸多领导处处优先问题。这种状况不仅严重制约了科学技术的健康发展，也产生了很不好的社会影响，危害极大。国家强大，科学技术是第一驱动力，科研人员是第一人才资源。如何让第一驱动提供最大动力，需要科研

宋圭武：科研资源应尽可能向一线专业技术人员倾斜

这多年，一些高校和科研院所，在课题资金分配、人才称号评选等方面，存在诸多领导处处优先问题。这种状况不仅严重制约了科学技术的健康发展，也产生了很不好的社会影响，危害极大。国家强大，科学技术是第一驱动力，科研人员是第一人才资源。如何让第一驱动提供最大动力，需要科研资源应尽可能向一线专业技术人员倾斜，也就是说要把最好的武器装备配备给第一线直接战斗人员。

当然，科研资源向第一线专业技术人员倾斜，这种办法也有弊端：主要是对一些既搞科研又搞行政的人员可能不公平，对这些人的科研激励不利，而且这部分人中有很大一部分人也确实是科研骨干。

但这种办法的好处巨大：一是可以激励更多人从事科研，同时，也让科研工作者有更多精力和时间专心搞科研，而不是无谓浪费很多宝贵时间。二是也是破解学术官本位的一种有效办法，可以促进科研行政管理更多向服务职能转变。三是也有利于提高科研质量。因为实际得利和挂名的，也是第一线实际干活的，权责对应，实际干活的自然有更多积极性确保质量，科研方面的假冒伪劣必然会大大减少。

总之，利弊综合分析：弊端应是短期和局部的，但好处是长期和全局的，而且越往后，好处越多越大。

具体科研资源如何向一线专业技术人员倾斜：一是在课题资金分配方面，应尽可能向一线倾斜，不担任任何行政职务的一线科研人员应有优先主持课题权。二是在发表论文和出版著作资助方面，不担任任何行政职务的一线科研人员应有优先发表权和优先资助权。三是科研办公条件方面，不担任任何行政职务的一线专业技术人员应有优先满足权，应尽可能配备最好的办公设备。四是在帮助解决就业方面，应优先考虑不担任任何行政职务的一线科研人员子女的就业问题。五是在人才称号评审方面，如优秀专家、领军人才等，不担任任何行政职务的一线专业技术人员应成为优先考虑对象。

保障机制：如何确保科研资源应尽可能向一线专业技术人员倾斜，不让其流于形式：第一，有关科研人才管理部门，包括涉及人才评定、课题评审等相关部门，都应建立健全相关制度设计，并尽可能严密化，同时还要强力执行。第二，纪委监委要把该制度的执行列入巡视巡察范围，对明知故犯执行不好的，要严格追究相关负责人责任。若有必要，也可以考虑实行一票否决制。一票否决制虽然副作用很大，但面对关键问题，还是需要发挥好其严厉作用。这里我们要认识到，世界上不存在十全十美的制度，任何制度设计都存在利弊问题，其利弊并且需要具体问题具体分析，然后根据利弊大小进行取舍。这里我们是否选择一票否决制也是这样。

Song Guiwu : Scientific research resources should be as much as possible to the front-line professional and technical personnel

For many years, some universities and research institutes, in the allocation of project funds, talent title selection and other aspects, there are many leadership priority problems.This situation not only seriously restricts the healthy development of science and technology, but also has a very bad social impact, which is very harmful.A strong country, science and technology is the first driving force, and scientific research personnel are the first talent resources.How to make the first driving force provide the greatest power? It needs scientific research resources to be as much as possible to the front-line professional and technical personnel, that is to say, to supply the best weapons and equipment to the front-line direct combat personnel.Of course, scientific research resources to the front-line professional and technical personnel, this method also has disadvantages: mainly for some people who are engaged in both scientific research and administrative work may be unfair, and for these people's scientific research incentives are not favorable, and a large part of these people are indeed the backbone of scientific research.But the benefits of this method are huge: first, it can stimulate more people to engage in scientific research, and at the same time, it also allows scientific researchers to have more energy and time to concentrate on scientific research, rather than wasting a lot of precious time.Second, it is also an effective way to break the academic official standard, which can promote the transformation of scientific research administration to the service function. Third, it is also conducive to improving the quality of scientific research.Because the actual benefit and hanging name, is also the first line of actual work, corresponding rights and responsibilities, the actual work of the nature has more enthusiasm to ensure the quality, the scientific research of fake and shoddy will be greatly reduced. In a word, the comprehensive analysis of pros and cons: the disadvantages should be short-term and local, but the benefits are long-term and global, and the more back, the more benefits. How to tilt the specific scientific research resources to the front-line professional and technical personnel: First, in the allocation of project funds, it should be as much as possible to the front line, the front-line scientific research personnel without any administrative position should have the priority to preside over the project.Second, in the funding of published papers and published works, the front-line scientific research personnel without any administrative position should have the priority to publish and the priority to fund.Third, in the scientific research office conditions, the front-line professional and technical personnel without any administrative position should have the priority to satisfy the right, and should be equipped with the best office equipment as much as possible.Fourth, in helping to solve the employment problem, the employment problem of the children of the front-line scientific research personnel without any administrative position should be given priority.Fifth, in the evaluation of talent titles, such as outstanding experts, leading talents, the front-line professional and technical personnel without any administrative position should be given priority. Guarantee mechanism: how to ensure that scientific research resources should be as much as possible to the front line professional and technical personnel, not to let it become a formality: First, the relevant scientific research personnel management departments, including related personnel evaluation, project review and other relevant departments, should establish and improve the relevant system design, and as far as possible strict, but also strong implementation. Second, the Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision should include the implementation of the system into the scope of inspection and patrol, and strictly investigate the responsibility of the relevant person in charge. If necessary, the implementation of a veto system can also be considered. Although the side effects of a veto system are very large, but in the face of key problems, it is still necessary to play a good role in its strict role. Here we should realize that there is no perfect system in the world, any system design has its pros and cons, and the pros and cons need to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis, and then make a choice according to the size of the pros and cons. Here we choose a veto system is also the same.

来源：宋圭武