摘要：Abstract:Despite much research on the societal and individual consequences of new digital communication technologies, little atten

为了更好地传播知识，推动期刊国际合作，本刊与《城市研究》（Urban Studies）

How digitalisation influences neighbourhood change

数字化如何影响街区变化

George C Galster（美国韦恩州立大学）

首次出版时间：2023/09/29｜研究论文

Abstract: Despite much research on the societal and individual consequences of new digital communication technologies, little attention has been paid to the neighbourhood as a locus of impact. This paper investigates how the growing influence of social media and real estate platforms will likely shape the process of neighbourhood change and the geographic distribution of population and financial resources. The investigation is grounded on a model of neighbourhood dynamics based on flows of households and property investments across metropolitan space, which are guided by imperfect information about housing market opportunities. Decision-makers receive information passively (increasingly through local and non-local social media) and when uncertainty about course of action becomes intolerable they turn to active search (increasingly involving online real estate platforms). Based on this conceptual framing, the article synthesises extant research to draw implications on how the expanding use of these new technologies is affecting neighbourhoods by changing the composition of decision-makers and the information that underpins their decisions. It concludes that digitalisation reduces neighbourhoods residential stability, social capital and diversity, while rendering their dwellings less well-maintained and more expensive.

摘要：尽管人们对新数字通信技术给社会和个人带来的影响进行了大量研究，但很少有人关注其对街区的影响。本文探讨了社交媒体和房地产平台日益增长的影响力可能会如何影响街区的变化过程以及人口和财政资源的地理分布。这项研究基于一个街区动态模型，该模型以大都市空间内的家庭流动和房产投资为基础，而家庭流动和房产投资又受到有关住房市场机会的不完全信息的引导。决策者被动地接收信息（越来越多地通过本地和非本地社交媒体），当行动过程中的不确定性变得无法忍受时，他们才会转向主动搜索（越来越多地涉及在线房地产平台）。在这一概念框架的基础上，本文对现有研究进行了综合，以得出这些新技术的广泛使用是如何通过改变决策者的构成及其决策所依据的信息来影响街区的。我们得出的结论是：数字化降低了街区的居住稳定性，减少了社会资本和多样性，同时使街区内的住宅维护弱化，价格更加昂贵。

Keywords: gentrification, housing search, neighbourhoods, real estate platforms, residential mobility, segregation, social media

关键词：绅士化、住房搜索、街区、房地产平台、住宅流动性、隔离、社交媒体

原文地址：

A conceptual framework for understanding neighbourhoods in the digital age

理解数字时代街区的概念框架

Tali Hatuka（以色列特拉维夫大学）

首次出版时间：2024/07/23｜研究论文

Abstract: Digital platforms are a central infrastructure that has dramatically changed our daily lives. Like any other urban infrastructure and amenity, the digital platform has a heterogeneous influence on social groups. Studies exploring the influence of the digital on the mundane tend to focus on users, their socioeconomic status and their digital skills. However, digitisation is not an exogenous force; rather, it relates to culture and place. The departure point of this article is to conceptualise the idea of neighbourhood in the digital age, which offers a path towards understanding the role of the digital in our daily lives in relation to places. The article starts by discussing the neighbourhood and digitisation, addressing gaps and links that connect these themes. This discussion is followed by presentation of a framework linking the material with the virtual in understanding neighbourhoods. This framework is based on gathering data on four key issues: spatial configuration, digital infrastructure, demographic profile and digital participation in a neighbourhood. Jointly, these four issues are viewed as the means to contextualise and expand the way we think about the interplay between infrastructures and the agency of the neighbourhood’s inhabitants.

摘要：数字平台作为一种核心基础设施，极大地改变了我们的日常生活。与其他任何城市基础设施和便利设施一样，数字平台对不同社会群体的影响是异质性的。探索数字技术对日常生活影响的研究往往侧重于用户、其社会经济地位和数字技能。然而，数字化并不是外力，而是与文化和地点相关的。本文的出发点是将数字时代的街区理念概念化，为理解数字技术在我们日常生活中与地方的关系提供途径。本文首先讨论了街区和数字化，探讨了这两个主题之间的差距和联系。之后，笔者提出一个将物质与虚拟联系起来理解社区的框架。该框架基于四个关键问题相关数据的收集：街区的空间布局、数字基础设施、人口统计资料和街区的数字参与度。总的来说，这四个问题被视为一种途径，旨在将我们对基础设施和街区居民能动性之间相互作用的思考置于环境背景中并加以扩展。

Keywords:digitisation, inhabitants, methodology, segregation, smart cities

关键词：数字化、居民、方法论、隔离、智慧城市

原文地址：https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241257392

Zoning a productive city? A typology of clustering, diversity and specialisation in Melbourne’s urban industrial areas

划分生产性城市的区域？墨尔本城市工业区的集群、多样性和专业化的分类法

Carl Grodach（澳大利亚莫纳什大学）

Nícolas Guerra-Tão（澳大利亚莫纳什大学）

首次出版时间：2024/12/16｜研究论文

Abstract: This research focuses on identifying the nuanced land use dynamics of urban industrial zones. Industrial lands in major Western cities have undergone significant change in the face of increasingly competitive property markets. At the same time, many countries seek to reshore manufacturing and support local industrial activity amid changes in production technologies, global supply chain shocks and geopolitical insecurity. Yet policymakers often fail to seriously consider the contemporary character of industrial zones and research has yet to analyse this in a systematic way. In response, we employ k-means cluster analysis to develop a typology of industrial zones in Melbourne, Australia. The typology captures a range of industrial zone clusters, which vary by industry mix, specialisation and spatial pattern. While some clusters represent traditional industrial areas, others are highly diverse in terms of firm and employment mix encompassing service sector activity and specialised manufacturing industries. These variations underscore the limitations of traditional zoning frameworks focused predominately on use separation and point towards the need for more responsive and context-specific urban economic development and industrial land use policies.

摘要：本文主要关注城市工业区土地利用细微动态的确认。面对竞争日益激烈的房地产市场，西方主要城市的工业用地发生了重大变化。与此同时，在生产技术变革、全球供应链冲击和地缘政治不安全的情况下，许多国家寻求回迁制造业，并支持本地工业活动。然而，政策制定者往往没有认真考虑工业区的当代特征，相关研究也尚未系统地分析这一点。有鉴于此，我们采用K均值聚类分析来制定澳大利亚墨尔本工业区的分类法。该分类法涵盖了一系列工业区集群，这些集群因产业结构、专业化和空间格局而异。虽然一些集群代表传统工业领域，但其他集群在企业和就业结构方面高度多样化，包括服务业活动和专业制造业。这些差异突显了传统分区框架主要侧重于用途分离的局限性，并表明有必要制定反应更迅速、更符合具体情况的城市经济发展和工业用地政策。

Keywords: economic development, industrial clusters, land use, urban planning, zoning

关键词：经济发展、产业集群、土地利用、城市规划、分区

原文地址：

Hello, stranger? How attraction trumps interaction in ‘new’ public space

你好，陌生人？在“新的”公共空间中，吸引力如何战胜互动性

Sverre Bjerkeset（挪威奥斯陆建筑与设计学院）

首次出版时间：2024/12/16｜研究论文

Abstract: Chance interaction among diverse strangers is a much-celebrated feature of urbanity. The rise in privately owned and managed public spaces, tending to displace people, activities and exchanges that may threaten business interests, has thus raised broad concerns. However, how such ‘new’, high-profile public spaces of the neoliberal or entrepreneurial city differ from ‘traditional’, everyday ones in terms of spontaneous encounters, is not well covered in the ever-growing public space research. Drawing on long-term ethnographic fieldwork in Oslo, Norway, this article explores the occurrence of peaceful chance interactions among strangers in ‘new’ public space. In the two examined urban squares, representing ‘traditional’ and ‘new’ public space, strangers interact on a regularised versus an episodic basis, reflecting major differences in ‘contact-supporting circumstances’. A close reading of the pertinent scholarly literature indicates that these findings have a broader significance. The article’s key contribution is the detailed documentation and conceptualisation of basic circumstances that distinguish a ‘new’ from an ordinary, everyday public space with regards to chance interactions. Herein, the study points to an important shift in urban governance and planning since the 1980s. A market-led notion of attractiveness in the physical and social environment takes centre stage in prestigious urban developments, at the expense of the disordered exchanges of everyday life.

摘要：不同陌生人之间的偶然互动是城市性的一个著名特征。私人拥有和管理的公共空间的增加引起了人们的广泛关注，它们往往会取代可能威胁商业利益的人员、活动和交流。然而，不断增长的公共空间研究并没有很好地研究新自由主义或创业城市的这种“新的”、广受关注的公共空间在自发相遇方面与“传统的”、日常的公共空间有何不同。本文以在挪威奥斯陆进行的长期民族志田野调查为基础，探讨了陌生人在“新的”公共空间中发生和平偶然互动的情况。在代表“传统的”和“新的”公共空间的两个被考察的城市广场中，陌生人的互动是常规的还是偶发的，反映了“接触支持环境”的主要差异。仔细阅读相关学术文献后，我们发现这些研究结果具有更广泛的意义。本文的主要贡献是详细记录并概念化了“新的”公共空间与普通日常公共空间中的偶然互动方面的基本差异。在此，本文指出自1980年代以来，城市治理和规划发生了重要转变。在著名的城市发展项目中，以市场为导向的物理和社会环境吸引力概念占据中心地位，而日常生活的无序交流则成为牺牲品。

Keywords: entrepreneurial city, privatisation, public space, social interaction, urban ethnography

关键词：创业城市、私有化、公共空间、社会互动、城市民族志

原文地址：https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241295974

以上内容源自

Urban Studies 论文快递: 第二百七十七期

Urban Studies 论文快递: 第二百七十八期

Urban Studies 论文快递: 第二百七十九期

Urban Studies 论文快递: 第二百八十期

排版 | 顾春雪

来源：国际城市规划