安玲学记（256）——精读期刊论文3.1评估指标（2）

摘要：This issue of tweets will introduce the 3.1 evaluation Indicators (2) of the journal paper "Research on Supply chain Security Risk

分享兴趣，传播快乐，

增长见闻，留下美好。

亲爱的您，这里是LearingYard学苑！

今天小编为大家带来“精读期刊论文《混源操作系统供应链安全风险评估方法研究》3.1评估指标（2）"。

欢迎您的访问！

Share interest, spread happiness,

increase knowledge, and leave beautiful.

Dear, this is the LearingYard Academy!

Today, the editor brings the "the 3.1 evaluation Indicators (2) of the journal paper 'Research on Supply chain Security Risk assessment Method of Mixed source Operating System'".

Welcome to visit!

一、内容摘要（Content summary）

本期推文将从思维导图、精读内容、知识补充三个方面介绍精读期刊论文《混源操作系统供应链安全风险评估方法研究》的3.1评估指标（2）。

This issue of tweets will introduce the 3.1 evaluation Indicators (2) of the journal paper "Research on Supply chain Security Risk assessment Method of Mixed source Operating System" from three aspects: mind mapping, intensive reading content, and knowledge supplement.

二、思维导图（Mind Mapping）

三、精读内容（Detailed Reading Content）

该部分从两个方面来分析评估指标，分别为技术和管理。技术方面又分为结构组成风险评估、过程风险评估，本期将带来过程风险评估的分享。

This section analyzes and evaluates the indicators from two aspects, namely technology and management. In terms of technology, it is further divided into structural composition risk assessment and process risk assessment. This issue will bring you a sharing on process risk assessment.

作者对混源操作系统生命周期中DevOps模式下过程风险的总结分析，结合设计、编码、构建、测试、发布和运维6个阶段的评估要点。

The author summarizes and analyzes the process risks under the DevOps model in the life cycle of mixed-source operating systems, combining the assessment key points of the six stages: design, coding, build, testing, release, and operation and maintenance.

在设计阶段，风险集中于软件包选取和设计。需考察软件包来源、许可证合规性、可替代性及自主演化能力，确保可溯性与可用性。设计文档的完整性直接影响后续阶段风险控制。在编码阶段，因开发团队差异，风险需针对单个软件包单独评估。重点关注代码规范性、安全漏洞引入可能性及团队协作中的一致性管理。在构建阶段，分源码编译和镜像构建两步，风险主要来自构建工具的可靠性及配置文件的准确性。需核查开发信息、依赖关系等，防止植入恶意代码或篡改。在测试阶段，测试方案完备性和工具性能是关键。需平衡测试覆盖度与工具自身安全性，避免测试环节成为攻击载体。在发布阶段，发布渠道的安全性和验证机制是核心风险点。需防范中间人攻击，确保交付内容未被篡改。在运维阶段，依赖风险信息收集的及时性、响应速度及补丁升级渠道的安全性。需建立闭环漏洞管理流程，保障用户端快速修复能力。

During the design stage, risks are concentrated on the selection and design of software packages. It is necessary to examine the source of the software package, license compliance, substitutability and autonomous evolution capability to ensure traceability and availability. The completeness of the design document directly affects the risk control in the subsequent stages. During the coding stage, due to differences among development teams, risks need to be evaluated separately for each individual software package. Focus on code standardization, the possibility of introducing security vulnerabilities, and consistency management in team collaboration. During the construction phase, it is divided into two steps: source code compilation and image construction. The risks mainly come from the reliability of the construction tools and the accuracy of the configuration files. It is necessary to verify the development information, dependencies, etc., to prevent the implantation of malicious code or tampering. During the testing phase, the completeness of the test plan and the performance of the tools are crucial. It is necessary to balance the test coverage and the security of the tool itself to prevent the testing process from becoming a carrier of attacks. During the release stage, the security and verification mechanism of the release channel are the core risk points. It is necessary to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks and ensure that the delivered content has not been tampered with. During the operation and maintenance stage, it relies on the timeliness of risk information collection, response speed, and the security of patch upgrade channels. It is necessary to establish a closed-loop vulnerability management process to ensure the rapid repair capability at the user end.

混源系统的风险贯穿全生命周期，需结合工具链安全、流程规范性和动态监控综合评估。DevOps的自动化特性可提升效率，但也可能放大工具链漏洞的影响，需在敏捷性与安全性间取得平衡。

The risks of mixed-source systems run through the entire life cycle and need to be comprehensively evaluated in combination with toolchain security, process standardization, and dynamic monitoring. The automated nature of DevOps can enhance efficiency, but it may also amplify the impact of toolchain vulnerabilities. A balance needs to be struck between agility and security.

四、知识补充——DevOps模式（Knowledge Supplementation - DevOps Model）

DevOps是一种结合开发与运维的文化、实践和工具的集合，旨在通过自动化和协作提升软件交付的速度、质量和稳定性。它强调团队间的高效沟通与协作，打破传统开发与运维的隔阂。

DevOps is a collection of cultures, practices, and tools that combine development and operations, aiming to enhance the speed, quality, and stability of software delivery through automation and collaboration. It emphasizes efficient communication and collaboration among teams, breaking down the barriers between traditional development and operation and maintenance.