摘要：This study reports on the process and development of middle school sciencefair projects inspired by a summer science program of ci

今天分享两本ssci期刊，SCIENCE EDUCATION和STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF

SCIENCE，分别是教育学和历史学方向的Q1期刊，在各自领域中有很高的认可度，值得各位作者投稿。

(1)期刊名称：SCIENCE EDUCATION

分区：JCR Q1

ISSN：0036-8326

eISSN：:1098-237X

当前出版商：WILEY111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ

研究方向：Education & Educational Research

更多教育学ssci期刊信息，可以直接与人工客服沟通，掌握更多信息：

来源出版物：SCIENCE EDUCATION

卷102期3页593-644

DOI10.1002/sce.21335

出版时间：MAY 2018

已索引：2018-05-02

文献类型：Article

可+：yanglwfb681，了解更多ssci期刊检索信息

摘要信息：

This study reports on the process and development of middle school science
fair projects inspired by a summer science program of citizen science monitoring
(Monarch Larvae Monitoring Project) with their classroom teacher. We gathered
and analyzed qualitative data (interviews, focus groups, and project boards).
Our analysis revealed three key findings: (1) the process of developing and
completing a student-driven investigation for a science fair engages students in
the scientific practices envisioned by the Next Generation Science Standards,
(2) citizen science served as a springboard for the development of authentic
participation in science, and (3) there are dual roles of a teacher as both
mentor and master. Our findings have important implications for science
education and student science fairs.

(2)期刊名称：STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

分区：JCR Q1

ISSN：0039-3681

eISSN：1879-2510

当前出版商：ELSEVIER SCI LTD125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS, ENGLAND

研究方向：History & Philosophy of Science

Web of Science 类别：History & Philosophy Of Science

来源出版物：STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

卷98页49-61

DOI10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.01.004

出版时间：APR 2023

在线发表：FEB 2023

已索引：2023-04-05

文献类型：Article

摘要信息：

Urgent and complex sustainability problems are redefining the conditions for
success of science and instigating novel methodologies and new roles of values
in science. At the same time, sustainability research, mostly under the umbrella
of sustainability science, is abundant with dubious methods and dubious aims of
research, contributing to the already widespread crisis of the quality control
mechanisms in science. This paper identifies some of these dubious methods
(non-systemic thinking and specific contractual funding mechanisms) and dubious
aims (unclear aims and undisclosed value assumptions), and argues that, with
proper expert evaluation, it is possible to predict the type of content (and the
scientific value) these forms of research will result in. Identifying the forms
of research with predictably dubious results has practical implications for
doing and evaluating research in sustainability science, on the one hand, while
on the other, it contributes to the discussion on the ideal of wellordered
science by concretizing the ideal and developing a criterion for ordering
science in the case of sustainability science. Finally, the paper provides a
connection of sustainability science with the meta-science discussions on the
crisis in the quality of science and on science organization, what at the same
time more closely connects the philosophy of science with problems encountered
in research practice tackling urgent, complex and value-laden problems.

来源：小周讲科学