摘要：On January 14th and 15th, the third session of 13th Guangdong Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference
On January 14th and 15th, the third session of 13th Guangdong Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) and the third session of the 14th Provincial People's Congress opened successively. Delegates and committee members, filled with concern for economic and social development and carrying warm expectations from the frontlines, stepped firmly into the "Two Sessions" period.
Faced with the complex international situation, Guangdong continues to break through and stabilize foreign trade, with the province's foreign trade imports and exports expected to exceed 9 trillion yuan in 2024. Beyond stability, Guangdong's outward-oriented economy still has room for advancement. Wu Junxiong, chairman of Shenzhen Sinyink Group, who had just returned from a research trip to Mexico, showed reporters a 98-page market research analysis of Mexico, a report he completed over 46 days.
"I found that most private enterprises 'going global' are 'feeling their way across the river by touching the stones'," Wu Junxiong suggested that the government establish a special team to guide enterprises in 'going global', providing services such as policy interpretation, market analysis, and legal consultation to help enterprises plan a clear path before 'going out'.
"During the initial planning phase, enterprises often lack a clear target positioning for overseas markets and fail to comprehensively and deeply analyze the macro environment, trade policies, and competitive maturity of the target markets. Due to the lack of a top-down overall strategic plan and a clear implementation path, enterprises find it difficult to accurately predict potential risks and adverse factors," said Peng Fuqiang, member of CPPCC Guangdong Committee and vice president of the Hong Kong Chamber of Commerce (Qianhai), regarding the difficulties in planning for enterprises 'going global'. He believes that various challenges often make many enterprises "dare not go" or "hesitate to go" When making decisions, thus missing market opportunities.
Peng Fuqiang suggested that the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) could select enterprises with conditions and foundations for international operations as key cultivation targets, and implement a "pilot" cultivation plan with "one policy for one enterprise", encouraging and guiding these key enterprises to establish overseas distribution and service networks, logistics distribution centers, overseas warehouses, and overseas operation centers, and to build a localized supply chain that coordinates production capacity and integrates into the overseas retail system. For local industries suitable for 'going global', support enterprises on the industrial chain to create an 'ecosystem for going out', and in conjunction with industry associations, encourage enterprises to 'go out' together.
Manufacturing is the backbone of Guangdong, and the stability of industrial production is an important foundation for the province. In 2025, how will the manufacturing powerhouse strive to "create a new Guangdong"?
This year, sun Dongmei, the chief scientist of Guangdong Yifang Pharmaceutical Co., ltd., brought forward a proposal on developing new qualitative productive forces and building a new model of "Guangdong manufacturing, hong Kong and Macao supervision". In her view, there is a certain degree of overlap and homogenization competition in the industrial layout within the GBA, and the integration of the industrial chain, supply chain, and innovation chain is insufficient, which also restricts the overall competitiveness and innovation capacity of the regional industry.
"It is suggested to optimize the industrial layout and deepen coordinated development," sun Dongmei said. Guangdong should increase the development intensity in advantageous fields such as high-end equipment manufacturing, new energy vehicles, and biomedicine, and cultivate internationally competitive industrial clusters. In addition, it should guide the formation of complementarity with financial technology, innovation research and development, and high-end service industries in the Hong Kong and Macao regions.
Wu Xueming, a standing member of CPPCC Guangdong Committee and chairman of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Youth Society, also focuses on the topic of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao industrial cooperation. Wu Xueming's research found that although Nansha has made many efforts to open up to the outside world with itsimportant positioning, its influence and participation in global economic and technological cooperation are still low, and there is a large growth space for the number and proportion of foreign-funded enterprises in Nansha.
"We can learn from Shenzhen's 'industrial chain ecosystem' model and Singapore's 'Star Island-Global Connection' model to build a complete industrial ecosystem around fields such as integrated circuits, new energy, and artificial intelligence," wu Xueming suggested. Nansha can establish more linkage mechanisms with Hong Kong and Macao research institutions and key science and technology parks in the mainland cities of the GBA, and set up "Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Innovation Laboratories" to attract international research institutions and start-up enterprises to settle in.
Promoting the deep integration of the real economy and the digital economy, More regions are making efforts. Lai Linfeng, a Guangdong Provincial People's Congress delegate and chairman of Guangdong 115 Technology Co., ltd, talked about relying on Meizhou's internet industry foundation and livable environment to create a base for the integration of the digital economy and artificial intelligence industry, attracting enterprises and talents in the fields of artificial intelligence, big data, blockchain, etc., to settle down. This move will not only stimulate regional innovation vitality but also inject new momentum into achieving balanced regional development.
Source: lingnan On the Cloud
代表委员热议经济大省“稳中求进”
1月14日、15日，省政协十三届三次会议、省十四届人大三次会议相继开幕。代表委员们满怀对经济社会发展的关切，带着来自一线的热忱期盼，步履坚定地走进“两会时间”。
面对纷繁复杂的国际形势，广东持续向上突围稳住外贸，2024年广东外贸进出口将突破9万亿元。稳健之上，广东外向型经济不乏进击的空间。上周才从墨西哥调研回来的深圳中创盈科集团董事长伍俊雄，向记者展示了一份长达98页的墨西哥市场调研分析，这是他历时46天完成的报告。
“我发现，大部分民营企业‘出海’属于‘摸着石头过河’。”伍俊雄建议，政府设立企业“出海”辅导专班，为企业提供政策解读、市场分析、法律咨询等服务，帮助企业在“走出去”之前就做好清晰的路径规划。
“在初期规划阶段，企业常缺乏明晰的海外市场目标定位，未能全面深入地剖析海外市场的宏观环境、贸易政策以及目标市场的竞争成熟状况。由于缺乏自上而下的整体战略规划和清晰的实施路径，企业难以准确预见潜在的风险与不利因素。”对于企业“出海”规划之困，省政协委员、前海香港商会副会长彭富强认为，种种挑战往往使不少企业在决策时“不敢出”或“犹豫出”，从而错失了市场良机。
彭富强建议，粤港澳大湾区可以选取有条件有基础开展国际化经营的企业作为重点培育对象，“一企一策”实施“领航者”培育计划，鼓励引导这些重点企业设立境外分销和服务网络、物流配送中心、海外仓、海外运营中心等，建立产能协调的本地化供应链，融入境外零售体系。针对当地适合“走出去”的优势产业上下游，扶持产业链上的企业打造“出海”生态圈，联合行业协会，鼓励企业抱团“出海”。
制造业当家，工业生产之稳是广东重要底气。2025年，制造大省如何努力“再造一个新广东”?
今年上会，广东一方制药有限公司首席科学家孙冬梅带来了一份关于发展新质生产力，构建“广东制造、港澳监制”新模式的建议。在她看来，粤港澳大湾区内部产业布局存在一定程度的重叠和同质化竞争，产业链、供应链和创新链的融合度不足，也制约了区域产业整体竞争力和创新能力的提升。
“建议优化产业布局，深化协同发展。”孙冬梅表示，广东应加大高端装备制造、新能源汽车、生物医药等优势领域发展力度，培育具有国际竞争力的产业集群；同时，引导与港澳地区金融科技、创新研发、高端服务等产业形成互补。
省政协常委、粤港澳大湾区青年总会主席吴学明同样关注粤港澳产业合作的话题。吴学明调研发现，南沙在“三区一中心”的战略定位下，虽在对外开放方面做出了不少努力，但其在全球经济和科技合作中的影响力和参与度仍较低，南沙外资企业数量及占比有较大增长空间。
“可以借鉴深圳‘产业链生态’模式及新加坡‘星岛-全球连接’模式，围绕集成电路、新能源和人工智能等领域打造完整产业生态体系。”吴学明建议，南沙可以与港澳科研机构以及大湾区内地城市的重点科技园区建立更多联动机制，设立“粤港澳联合创新实验室”，吸引国际科研机构及初创企业入驻。
推动实体经济与数字经济深度融合，更多区域在发力。省人大代表、广东一一五科技股份有限公司董事长赖霖枫谈道，依托梅州的互联网产业基础和宜居环境，可打造数字经济与人工智能产业融合基地，吸引人工智能、大数据、区块链等领域的企业和人才落户，此举不仅能激发区域创新活力，也将为实现区域平衡发展注入新动力。
文丨记者 孙绮曼 王丹阳
翻译丨赵凡
审校丨王枥焓
来源：羊城派